Comments on: Slam dancing in the liebenswelt http://marctyrrell.com/2008/12/03/slam-dancing-in-the-liebenswelt/ Being in the main the musings of a Symbolic Anthropologist Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:34:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: chinese searches http://marctyrrell.com/2008/12/03/slam-dancing-in-the-liebenswelt/comment-page-1/#comment-3409 chinese searches Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:53:38 +0000 http://marctyrrell.com/?p=84#comment-3409 <strong>hey...</strong> wow... hey…

wow…

]]> By: admin http://marctyrrell.com/2008/12/03/slam-dancing-in-the-liebenswelt/comment-page-1/#comment-2377 admin Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:02:14 +0000 http://marctyrrell.com/?p=84#comment-2377 Hi Drew, I think it might or, to be possibly more precise, it would describe a perceptual "world" or "phase" that was different from that of the static (or linear) observed. As a note, some of what I wrote here was influenced by Antoine Bousquet's The Scientific Way of Warfare" (January, 2009 http://cup.columbia.edu/book/978-0-231-70078-8/the-scientific-way-of-warfare). I find the interplay of metaphoric phases that he talks about resonates with Charlies mono- / poly- phasic ideas on consciousness / culture. Hi Drew,

I think it might or, to be possibly more precise, it would describe a perceptual “world” or “phase” that was different from that of the static (or linear) observed.

As a note, some of what I wrote here was influenced by Antoine Bousquet’s The Scientific Way of Warfare” (January, 2009 http://cup.columbia.edu/book/978-0-231-70078-8/the-scientific-way-of-warfare). I find the interplay of metaphoric phases that he talks about resonates with Charlies mono- / poly- phasic ideas on consciousness / culture.

]]> By: Drew http://marctyrrell.com/2008/12/03/slam-dancing-in-the-liebenswelt/comment-page-1/#comment-2376 Drew Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:53:34 +0000 http://marctyrrell.com/?p=84#comment-2376 I think, sir, that you have hit upon something here. What if someone was in the position of observer, vis-a-vis the static condition? In other words, they could perceive the static condition but was only was capable of living in the dynamic? Do you think this describes "shaman" in this paradigm? I think, sir, that you have hit upon something here.

What if someone was in the position of observer, vis-a-vis the static condition? In other words, they could perceive the static condition but was only was capable of living in the dynamic?

Do you think this describes “shaman” in this paradigm?

]]>