<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Byzantium a model for how to deal with Afghanistan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marctyrrell.com/2010/01/28/is-byzantium-a-model-for-how-to-deal-with-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marctyrrell.com/2010/01/28/is-byzantium-a-model-for-how-to-deal-with-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Being in the main the musings of a Symbolic Anthropologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://marctyrrell.com/2010/01/28/is-byzantium-a-model-for-how-to-deal-with-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-13771</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marctyrrell.com/?p=394#comment-13771</guid>
		<description>Hi Zen,

Thanks :-).

That was one of several areas, I didn&#039;t really want to touch on, but you&#039;re totally right that it led to a lot of later problems and was pretty much a proximate cause of the loss of Egypt, Syria, etc.  I suspect that the bureaucratic faction actually relished the loss of those provinces, since they had some pretty strange traditions that they had no control over.  And, while the Muslim incursions helped create the Thematic system, they also led to a strengthening of the bureaucratic faction as well, especially in the area of what we would now call &quot;national security&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zen,</p>
<p>Thanks <img src='http://marctyrrell.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>That was one of several areas, I didn&#8217;t really want to touch on, but you&#8217;re totally right that it led to a lot of later problems and was pretty much a proximate cause of the loss of Egypt, Syria, etc.  I suspect that the bureaucratic faction actually relished the loss of those provinces, since they had some pretty strange traditions that they had no control over.  And, while the Muslim incursions helped create the Thematic system, they also led to a strengthening of the bureaucratic faction as well, especially in the area of what we would now call &#8220;national security&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zenpundit</title>
		<link>http://marctyrrell.com/2010/01/28/is-byzantium-a-model-for-how-to-deal-with-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-13770</link>
		<dc:creator>zenpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marctyrrell.com/?p=394#comment-13770</guid>
		<description>Good post!

The internal divisions within the empire, brought about by the Iconoclasts, was hardly helpful in maintaining a united front vis-a-vis the barbarians and the Muslims</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!</p>
<p>The internal divisions within the empire, brought about by the Iconoclasts, was hardly helpful in maintaining a united front vis-a-vis the barbarians and the Muslims</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.210 seconds -->
